<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia&#8217;s New Naming Convention: Does it make any C-E-N-X to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://symbianworld.org/3543-nokias-new-naming-convention-does-it-make-any-c-e-n-x-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://symbianworld.org/3543-nokias-new-naming-convention-does-it-make-any-c-e-n-x-to-you/</link>
	<description>The Nokia Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://symbianworld.org/3543-nokias-new-naming-convention-does-it-make-any-c-e-n-x-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-79414</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://symbianworld.org/?p=3543#comment-79414</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kinda silly to a certain extent, but I can understand why. Unless you really knew the brand you&#039;d have no idea Nokia had at one point 10 different series of phones. 

1xxx - bare bones model.
2xxx - entry level with color screen, and maybe a camera.
3xxx - entry level with more features than 2xxx series device.
5xxx - music centric series.
6xxx - mid-range series, good number of features.
7xxx - low to mid-range fashion centric series.
8xxx - high end fashion phones, with strong emphasis on design and materials.
9xxx - communicator series, phones with full keyboards.
Nseries - the ultimate in multimedia devices.
Eseries - business centric series.

We know the 5xxx series has been replaced by the Xseries, and the N and E are here to stay. But what of the rest of them? Sure, 1, 2, and 3 could all fit under the C umbrella, but what about the 6xxx series? I&#039;m predicting the end of the 7xxx series, but ss the 8xxx series gone too now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kinda silly to a certain extent, but I can understand why. Unless you really knew the brand you&#8217;d have no idea Nokia had at one point 10 different series of phones. </p>
<p>1xxx &#8211; bare bones model.<br />
2xxx &#8211; entry level with color screen, and maybe a camera.<br />
3xxx &#8211; entry level with more features than 2xxx series device.<br />
5xxx &#8211; music centric series.<br />
6xxx &#8211; mid-range series, good number of features.<br />
7xxx &#8211; low to mid-range fashion centric series.<br />
8xxx &#8211; high end fashion phones, with strong emphasis on design and materials.<br />
9xxx &#8211; communicator series, phones with full keyboards.<br />
Nseries &#8211; the ultimate in multimedia devices.<br />
Eseries &#8211; business centric series.</p>
<p>We know the 5xxx series has been replaced by the Xseries, and the N and E are here to stay. But what of the rest of them? Sure, 1, 2, and 3 could all fit under the C umbrella, but what about the 6xxx series? I&#8217;m predicting the end of the 7xxx series, but ss the 8xxx series gone too now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

